Обсуждение: I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical?
I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other client utils? No? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
On 05/20/2014 08:48 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: > I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to > change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other > client utils? No? > > This thread, perhaps?? http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20130923084634.GA15285@awork2.anarazel.de Cheers, Steve
Josh Berkus wrote: > I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to > change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other > client utils? No? There are others who think this has already happened. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Josh Berkus wrote: >> I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to >> change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other >> client utils? No? > > There are others who think this has already happened. > Well, I just compiled beta1, and it's still called recvlogical. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Josh Berkus wrote: > >> I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to > >> change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other > >> client utils? No? > > > > There are others who think this has already happened. > > > > Well, I just compiled beta1, and it's still called recvlogical. It was named pg_receivelogical initially. Then people argued that that's too long and voted for pg_recvlogical. I renamed it even though I didn't particularly like the new name.I fail to see the point in renaming it again. And I haven't seen any concensus for doing so either. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
On 05/20/2014 12:38 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote: >> On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> Josh Berkus wrote: >>>> I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to >>>> change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other >>>> client utils? No? >>> >>> There are others who think this has already happened. >>> >> >> Well, I just compiled beta1, and it's still called recvlogical. > > It was named pg_receivelogical initially. Then people argued that that's > too long and voted for pg_recvlogical. I renamed it even though I didn't > particularly like the new name. > I fail to see the point in renaming it again. And I haven't seen any > concensus for doing so either. Ah, I see. There was a name change, and I lost the argument. Got it. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
Josh Berkus wrote: > On 05/20/2014 12:38 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >>> Josh Berkus wrote: > >>>> I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to > >>>> change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other > >>>> client utils? No? > >>> > >>> There are others who think this has already happened. > >> > >> Well, I just compiled beta1, and it's still called recvlogical. > > > > It was named pg_receivelogical initially. Then people argued that that's > > too long and voted for pg_recvlogical. I renamed it even though I didn't > > particularly like the new name. > > I fail to see the point in renaming it again. And I haven't seen any > > concensus for doing so either. > > Ah, I see. There was a name change, and I lost the argument. Got it. Yes, I was quoting Douglas Adams. Sorry it was obscure: "There are some who believe that if the universe is ever completely understood, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more incomprehensible. There are others who think this has already happened..." -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services