Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict

On Dec 1, 2008, at 4:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> David E. Wheeler wrote:
>
>> Oh, well yeah, it should be consistent. But I'm still not sure  
>> that :3
>> should be allowed. OTOH, who does that, anyway?
>
> Anyone who prints times as %d:%d:%d.  You can find those in the wild.

I guess I should have expected that. Sheesh.

Best,

David