On 4/15/14, 11:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> On 4/14/14, 10:30 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> Yes. It probably won't be a huge change, but it will need a bit of code.
>
>> It might be more future-proof if the build farm just called make
>> check-world and used some other way to identify the individual tests in
>> that output. Otherwise, we'll need a new build farm release every time
>> a test suite is added.
>
> That argument would be more convincing if "make check-world" worked
> on Windows ...
What about it doesn't work on Windows?