(2014/03/29 7:23), Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp> wrote:
>> (2014/03/28 14:37), Michael Paquier wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Inoue, Hiroshi <inoue@tpf.co.jp> wrote:
>>> No differences. I just changed the name of this variable to be a
>>> maximum consistent with the parameter introduced.
>>
>>
>> There are some rollback_on_error in dlg_wingui.c.
> Ouch, thanks.
>
>>>> The length of connection strings seem to be increased at least 3 bytes.
>>>> Is it right?
>>>
>>> Do you mean that with the introduction of the new parameter AA? If
>>> yes, well I guess it is increased by 5 bytes ";AA=[0|1|2]".
>>
>>
>> Isn't the difference between
>> A1=7.4;AA=[0|1|2] and A1=7.4-[0|1|2]
>> ?
>> I introduced the latter only to skimp on 3 bytes.
> Oh yes, sorry. Is it a problem though? Because if we switch to
> string-only values for AA this could get longer by 10~20 bytes
> depending on the parameter values.
SQLDriverConnect() returns the complete connection strings when
requested. makeConnectString() in dlg_specific.c makes connection
strings which are acceptable for specified buffers.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue