Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Дата
Msg-id 52F1535A.5090300@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 02/04/2014 03:08 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
>
> Do you know about what it would cost?  Could official community funds 
> be used for it (it seems like something that is cheap, but which you 
> wouldn't want to be forgotten about some month.)
>
> Having an AMI would help, but even with an AMI in place, MinGW is 
> still insanely slow.  Running "make" on already made PostgreSQL (so 
> there was nothing to actually do) takes 1.5 minutes.  And a make after 
> a "make clean" takes half an hour.  This is on an actual desktop, not 
> an AWS micro instance.  So doing a git bisect is just painful.  Is the 
> MSVC build faster?
>
>


Would have to check with the same build options (cassert and debug have 
major timing effects.) I agree it's not lightning fast like "make -j 4" 
on a decent linux box.

cheers

andrew






В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Christian Kruse
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition
Следующее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan