Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 31632.1391554047@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 02/04/2014 03:08 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> Having an AMI would help, but even with an AMI in place, MinGW is
>> still insanely slow. Running "make" on already made PostgreSQL (so
>> there was nothing to actually do) takes 1.5 minutes. And a make after
>> a "make clean" takes half an hour. This is on an actual desktop, not
>> an AWS micro instance. So doing a git bisect is just painful. Is the
>> MSVC build faster?
> Would have to check with the same build options (cassert and debug have
> major timing effects.) I agree it's not lightning fast like "make -j 4"
> on a decent linux box.
I wonder if ccache exists for Mingw. That thing makes a huge difference
in the perceived build speed ...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: