On 12/24/13, 10:29 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
>> On 12/22/13, 2:36 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>>> I'm not sure whether the policy is to update the version number of the
>>> extension for such a change. As the library is always "isn.so", two
>>> versions cannot live in parallel anyway. If it is useful, the second
>>> patch attached also upgrade the version number.
>>
>> If you are not changing anything in the SQL, then you don't need to
>> change the version number.
>
> Ok, thanks for the information. I understand that the version number is
> about the API, not the implementation.
>
> If so, there is only the one-liner patch to consider.
This patch doesn't apply anymore. Please submit an updated patch for
the commit fest.