Re: pg_rewarm status

On 12/17/2013 06:34 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have used pg_prewarm during some of work related to Buffer Management and
>> other performance related work. It is quite useful utility.
>> +1 for reviving this patch for 9.4
> 
> Any other votes?

I still support this patch (as I did originally), and don't think that
the overlap with pgFincore is of any consequence.  pgFincore does more
than pgrewarm ever will, but it's also platform-specific, so it still
makes sense for both to exist.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com