Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 52A77191.6010907@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | ANALYZE sampling is too good (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/10/2013 11:49 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I don't think that anyone believes that not doing block sampling is > tenable, fwiw. Clearly some type of block sampling would be preferable > for most or all purposes. As discussed, we need math though. Does anyone have an ACM subscription and time to do a search? Someone must. We can buy one with community funds, but no reason to do so if we don't have to. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: