Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On ons, 2012-02-29 at 14:20 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In particular, I observe that we get pushback anytime we break something
>> in a way that makes SSL config files be required on the client side;
>> see bug #6302 for most recent example.
> *If* we were to make a change in libpq analogous to the server side, the
> effect would be to make the files less required, which could actually
> help the case of bug #6302.
Hm? Obviously I misunderstood what changes you were proposing to make,
so would you mind spelling it out?
regards, tom lane