Re: no default hash partition

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: no default hash partition
Дата
Msg-id 5255.1565196253@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: no default hash partition  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Actually, it also says this (in the blurb for the PARTITION OF clause):

>       Creates the table as a <firstterm>partition</firstterm> of the specified
>       parent table. The table can be created either as a partition for specific
>       values using <literal>FOR VALUES</literal> or as a default partition
>       using <literal>DEFAULT</literal>.  This option is not available for
>       hash-partitioned tables.

> which I think is sufficient.

Hm, that's rather confusingly worded IMO.  Is the antecedent of "this
option" just DEFAULT, or does it mean that you can't use FOR VALUES,
or perchance it means that you can't use a PARTITION OF clause
at all?

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Grouping isolationtester tests in the schedule
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Grouping isolationtester tests in the schedule