On 07/26/2013 11:42 AM, Greg Smith wrote:
> On 7/25/13 6:02 PM, didier wrote:
>> It was surely already discussed but why isn't postresql writing
>> sequentially its cache in a temporary file?
>
> If you do that, reads of the data will have to traverse that temporary
> file to assemble their data.
In case of crash recovery, a sequential reading of this file could be
performed as first step.
this should work fairly well in most cases, at least when the recovery
shared_buffers is not smaller
than the latest run of checkpoint-written dirty buffers.
--
Hannu Krosing
PostgreSQL Consultant
Performance, Scalability and High Availability
2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ