Hi,
I have reviewed this patch as a CF reviewer.
(2013/06/27 4:07), Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 20:34 -0400, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>> This patch is in the current CommitFest, does it still need to be
>> reviewed? If so, I notice that the version in pgfoundry's CVS is
>> rather different than the version the patch seems to have been built
>> against (presumably the pg_filedump-9.2.0.tar.gz release), and
>> conflicts in several places with cvs tip.
>
> Rebased against CVS tip; attached.
It looks fine, but I have one question here.
When I run pg_filedump with -k against a database cluster which
does not support checksums, pg_filedump produced checksum error as
following. Is this expected or acceptable?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*******************************************************************
* PostgreSQL File/Block Formatted Dump Utility - Version 9.3.0
*
* File: /tmp/pgsql/data/base/16384/16397
* Options used: -k
*
* Dump created on: Sat Jul 6 10:32:15 2013
*******************************************************************
Block 0 ********************************************************
<Header> -----
Block Offset: 0x00000000 Offsets: Lower 268 (0x010c)
Block: Size 8192 Version 4 Upper 384 (0x0180)
LSN: logid 0 recoff 0x00000000 Special 8192 (0x2000)
Items: 61 Free Space: 116
Checksum: 0x0000 Prune XID: 0x00000000 Flags: 0x0000 ()
Length (including item array): 268
Error: checksum failure: calculated 0xf797.
<Data> ------
Item 1 -- Length: 121 Offset: 8064 (0x1f80) Flags: NORMAL
Item 2 -- Length: 121 Offset: 7936 (0x1f00) Flags: NORMAL
Item 3 -- Length: 121 Offset: 7808 (0x1e80) Flags: NORMAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Please check attached script to reproduce it.
Also, I have update the help message and README.
Please check attached patch.
Regards,
--
Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga@uptime.jp>
Uptime Technologies, LLC. http://www.uptime.jp