On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 20:34 -0400, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> This patch is in the current CommitFest, does it still need to be
> reviewed? If so, I notice that the version in pgfoundry's CVS is
> rather different than the version the patch seems to have been built
> against (presumably the pg_filedump-9.2.0.tar.gz release), and
> conflicts in several places with cvs tip.
Rebased against CVS tip; attached.
> Also, would anyone be willing to convert this repository to git and
> post it on github or similar? pgfoundry is becoming increasingly
> difficult to use, for instance the 'Browse CVS Repository' link for
> pg_filedump and other projects is broken[1] and apparently has been
> for months[2], not to mention the general crumminess of using CVS [3].
Eventually, it would be nice to have a more full-featured offline
checker utility. Do we want to try to turn this utility into that, or
make a new one?
Regards,
Jeff Davis