On 6/24/2013 6:16 PM, David Johnston wrote:
>> speaking as a user and system administrator, I would NOT want to need to
>> >use different JAR files for each {jvm,postgres} version. that would be a
>> >nightmare.
>> >
>> >we have a LOT of systems in our manufacturing operations that are
>> >running older versions of {os, postgres, jvm} for various reasons, not
>> >the least of which is upgrades often break things in very non-obvious
>> >ways.
> I really don't see how this a problem in the normal case where you'd pick a
> JAR and then simply ignore upgrading as time progresses - just like you are
> doing with everything else.
currently, we bundle the postgresql.jar with our applications, and we
don't know what combination of systems it might end up being run on ...
the same package might land on solaris or AIX or Linux or even MS
Windows, and it might be run with anything from Java 1.5 or newer. The
postgresql server might be 8.3, 8.4, 9.x. as most of our deployments
end up deep in our Asian factories, the development group has little
control over the final runtime environment, and quite often new releases
of our packages are installed as application upgrades on existing
infrastructure hardware.
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast