Re: json accessors
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: json accessors |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50BFA4F7.4070606@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: json accessors (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/05/2012 01:49 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: >>> *) xmlpath/jsonpath do searching (and decomposition) but are very >>> clunky from sql perspective and probably absolutely nogo in terms if >>> GIST/GIN. postgres spiritually wants to do things via operators and >>> we should (if possible) at least consider that first > Why is it a nogo for GiST? Ltree works, doesn't it? If we only support > equality lookups in what way is a JSON doc different from a collection > of ltree rows? > > We'd probably want to use SP-GiST for better index size/performance, but > I don't see that this is impossible. Just some difficult code. > The set of paths for a single json datum can be huge, as opposed to one for a single ltree datum. That strikes me as a serious barrier. In any case, nobody I know of is even offering to do this - when they do we can look at the design. Until then I'm assuming nothing. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: