Re: About the performance of startup after dropping many tables
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: About the performance of startup after dropping many tables |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5095.1298000244@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | About the performance of startup after dropping many tables (Gan Jiadong <ganjd@huawei.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: About the performance of startup after dropping many
tables
Re: About the performance of startup after dropping many tables Re: About the performance of startup after dropping many tables |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gan Jiadong <ganjd@huawei.com> writes:
> we have PG 8.3.13 in our system. When running performance cases, we find the
> startup recovery cost about 3 minutes. It is too long in our system.
Maybe you should rethink the assumption that dropping 40000 tables is a
cheap operation. Why do you have that many in the first place, let
alone that many that you drop and recreate frequently? Almost
certainly, you need a better-conceived schema.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: