Looking for a better approach for pacemaker, DRDB VS pgsql 9.1 standby feature.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amador Alvarez
Тема Looking for a better approach for pacemaker, DRDB VS pgsql 9.1 standby feature.
Дата
Msg-id 503BC696.2080706@d2.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-admin
Hi there,
I am setting up a 2 node database cluster (Master/standby) on pgsql 9.1
and it looks to me that drdb option could be easier to maintain & keep
running after several failovers on a row, specially because after a
failover operation it is not too friendly to set back up automatically
the former primary as the new standby. Besides I would not like to
automate an rsync over the same data directory as it could be destroyed
by a 'wrong' syncing .
Any comments are welcome !

Thanks in advance,
A.A.


В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] Repeatable crash in pg_dump (with -d2 info)
Следующее
От: Rural Hunter
Дата:
Сообщение: Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)