On 08/20/2012 05:12 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 08/20/2012 07:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>> Moreover, as Josh just mentioned, anybody who
>> thinks it might be insufficiently secure for their purposes has got
>> plenty of alternatives available today (SSL certificates, PAM backed
>> by whatever-you-want, etc).
>>
>
> Yeah, I think we need to emphasize this lots more. Anyone who wants
> really secure authentication needs to be getting away from password
> based auth altogether. Another hash function will make very little
> difference.
Actually, I concede here. If we were pushing our other abilities more
visibly, I don't know that this argument would ever come up.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC
@cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579