On 07/08/12 15:14, Marko Kreen wrote:
> My point is that the behavior is not something completely new,
> that no-one has seen before.
>
> But it's different indeed from libpq default, so it's not something
> psycopg can convert to using unconditionally. But as optional feature
> it should be quite useful.
I agree. As an opt-in feature would be quite useful for large datasets
but then, named cursors already cover that ground. Not that I am against
it, just I'd like to see why:
curs = conn.cursor(row_by_row=True)
would be better than:
curs = conn.cursor("row_by_row")
Is row by row faster than fetching from a named cursor? Does it add less
overhead. If that's the case then would be nice to have it as a feature
for optimizing queries returning large datasets.
federico
--
Federico Di Gregorio federico.digregorio@dndg.it
Studio Associato Di Nunzio e Di Gregorio http://dndg.it
And anyone who yells "fork" deserves to get one stuck in them.
-- Dan Winship