Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes

Thanks to everyone, this part is pushed. I will waiting a bit before pushing 
topic-stater patch to have a time to look on buildfarm.

Alvaro, could you add a comment to CompareIndexInfo() to clarify why it doesn't 
compare indoptions (like DESC/ASC etc)? It doesn't matter for uniqueness of 
index but changes an order and it's not clear at least for me why we don't pay 
attention for that.

> In attached path I did:
> 1) fix a bug in CompareIndexInfo() which checks opfamily for including column
> 2) correct size for all vectors
> 3) Add assertion in various places to be sure that we don't try to use including 
> column as key column
> 4) per Peter Geoghegan idea add a error message if somebody adds options to 
> include column instead silently ignore it.
> 
> 

-- 
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
                                                    WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/