Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Susanne Ebrecht
Тема Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE
Дата
Msg-id 4FBBB291.3090401@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE  ("Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
Ответы Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Am 22.05.2012 15:27, schrieb Albe Laurenz:
> If you need different applications to routinely access each other's
> tables, why not assign them to different schemas in one database?

The use case in my mind for accessing more databases is when you want to
access stuff different languages.

You only can set encoding / LC_Collate per database not per schema.

So for different languages you might need different databases to do 
correct sorting / indexing.

Susanne

-- 
Dipl. Inf. Susanne Ebrecht - 2ndQuadrant
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
www.2ndQuadrant.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: weird error message in sepgsql
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE