Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE
Дата
Msg-id 1423.1337701375@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE  (Susanne Ebrecht <susanne@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE  (Susanne Ebrecht <susanne@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Susanne Ebrecht <susanne@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> The use case in my mind for accessing more databases is when you want to
> access stuff different languages.

> You only can set encoding / LC_Collate per database not per schema.

> So for different languages you might need different databases to do 
> correct sorting / indexing.

Encoding yes, but since 9.1 we have pretty fine-grained control of
collation.  So I think this argument is a lot weaker than it used
to be.  It would only really apply if you have one of the corner
cases where utf8 doesn't work for you.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Susanne Ebrecht
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE
Следующее
От: Florian Pflug
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Per-Database Roles