Re: Can pg_trgm handle non-alphanumeric characters?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Euler Taveira
Тема Re: Can pg_trgm handle non-alphanumeric characters?
Дата
Msg-id 4FAAFB5E.2030602@timbira.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Can pg_trgm handle non-alphanumeric characters?  ("MauMau" <maumau307@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Can pg_trgm handle non-alphanumeric characters?  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 09-05-2012 19:17, MauMau wrote:
> Then, does it make sense to remove "#define KEEPONLYALNUM" in 9.1.4? Would it
> cause any problems? If no, I wish that, because it eliminates the need to do
> the removal every time the users applies minor releases.
> 
If you do so, you'll break minor versions. IMHO the default is the desirable
behavior for almost all use cases (you are the first one that complain about
it). Maybe in the future, we should be able to flip this flag without
rebuilding binaries.


--   Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira       http://www.timbira.com.br/  PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento,
Suporte24x7 e Treinamento
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Joe Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: memory leak regression 9.1 versus 8.1
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: synchronous_commit and remote_write