Re: synchronous_commit and remote_write
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: synchronous_commit and remote_write |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4FAAE052.7020900@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: synchronous_commit and remote_write (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: synchronous_commit and remote_write
Re: synchronous_commit and remote_write |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> The naming is not arbitrary. -1 to changing it as suggested. > > It is as Aidan says, a state between receive and fsync, normally > referred to as write. > > Plus the word remote denotes it is on the standby, not the local master. > > So both words have specific meaning, and IMHO clear meaning. Clear to a postgres hacker, maybe. Not at *all* clear to our general users. The natural assumption is that "remote write" means that it's written to disk on the remote. Which is not what it means. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: