Re: synchronous_commit and remote_write

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: synchronous_commit and remote_write
Дата
Msg-id 4FAAE052.7020900@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: synchronous_commit and remote_write  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: synchronous_commit and remote_write  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: synchronous_commit and remote_write  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> The naming is not arbitrary. -1 to changing it as suggested.
> 
> It is as Aidan says, a state between receive and fsync, normally
> referred to as write.
> 
> Plus the word remote denotes it is on the standby, not the local master.
> 
> So both words have specific meaning, and IMHO clear meaning.

Clear to a postgres hacker, maybe.  Not at *all* clear to our general users.

The natural assumption is that "remote write" means that it's written to
disk on the remote. Which is not what it means.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Joe Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: memory leak regression 9.1 versus 8.1
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: bgwriter idle-mode behavior (was Re: Latch for the WAL writer)