Re: outdated comment in heapam.c

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: outdated comment in heapam.c
Дата
Msg-id 4FA2B66A.2030100@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на outdated comment in heapam.c  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 03.05.2012 16:08, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that when Heikki added the multi_insert code the following comment in
> htup.h wasn't updated:
> /*
>   * We ran out of opcodes, so heapam.c now has a second RmgrId.    These opcodes
>   * are associated with RM_HEAP2_ID, but are not logically different from
>   * the ones above associated with RM_HEAP_ID.  We apply XLOG_HEAP_OPMASK,
>   * although currently XLOG_HEAP_INIT_PAGE is not used for any of these.
>   */
> #define XLOG_HEAP2_FREEZE        0x00
> #define XLOG_HEAP2_CLEAN        0x10
> /* 0x20 is free, was XLOG_HEAP2_CLEAN_MOVE */
> #define XLOG_HEAP2_CLEANUP_INFO 0x30
> #define XLOG_HEAP2_VISIBLE        0x40
> #define XLOG_HEAP2_MULTI_INSERT    0x50
>
> I suggest simply to remove the "although currently XLOG_HEAP_INIT_PAGE is not
> used for any of these" part.

Thanks, fixed!

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: "unexpected EOF" messages
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Future In-Core Replication