Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
>> That "F0" class looks suspicious; are those really defined by
>> standard or did we encroach on standard naming space with
>> PostgreSQL-specific values?
>
> I think we screwed up on that :-(. So we ought to renumber those
> codes anyway. Perhaps use "PF" instead of "F0"?
Sounds good to me.
-Kevin