2012/3/2 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>:
>> with renaming to dblink_fdw_validator?
>
> Well, it's not the validator of the dblink_fdw, so maybe something like
> basic_postgresql_fdw_validator.
-1 for same reason. It's not the validator of basic_postgresql_fdw.
Using "fdw" in the name of validator which doesn't have actual FDW might
confuse users. Rather dblink_validator or libpq_option_validator is better?
One possible another idea is creating dblink_fdw which uses the
validator during "CREATE EXTENSION dblink" for users who store
connection information in FDW objects.
--
Shigeru Hanada