great,
thank you a lot Guillaume!
Cheers,
Boris
On 11/03/2011 12:20 PM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 12:02 +0100, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 11:22 +0100, boris pezzatti wrote:
>>> I tested after column types, and the colum that appears to create the
>>> very slow behaviour is of type boolean. Retrieving only 1 column for
>>> 3000 records delays at ca. 1 minute.
>>>
>>> Do you know any possible reason?
>>>
>> That's good to know. I tried with a boolean column, which gave me 7
>> seconds for 10000 rows. Which doesn't seem much, but it's actually 7
>> times more than without the boolean column.
>>
>> It seems we keep executing the same SQL command, 10000 times (actually
>> as much as your number of rows). And that is weird.
>>
>> I'll look into this.
>>
> OK, found it. We introduced some time ago a cache for type lookup. It
> seems the boolean type doesn't make it to the cache. The patch is
> commited. It should be available with the release of 1.14.1.
>
>