On 06/30/2011 08:21 AM, abraao895 wrote:
> - The HD of the PC1(master) dead. The WAL file don't have replicated because
> it is a asynchronous proccess and suppose that this already didn't have
> happened.
>
> - The PC2(slave) doesn't have the last record.
>
That's exactly how some transaction loss can happen in this situation.
Some software worried about this problem maintains a small transaction
log outside of the database, so that it's possible to reconstruct really
critical information after such a disaster.
In PostgreSQL 9.1, due to be released later this year, synchronous
replication is available on a per-transaction basis. That resolves the
concern you have--important transactions can be confirmed on one of the
slaves as a requirement before they commit.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD
Comprehensive and Customized PostgreSQL Training Classes:
http://www.2ndquadrant.us/postgresql-training/