Re: JDBC gripe list

On 03/29/11 1:49 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Unfortunately, the combination of these two requirements with the
> fact that the PostgreSQL driver supports JDK 1.2 or higher means
> that this option must not be allowed.  We'd have to require a Java
> version from this century to support that.  Maybe it's time to think
> about that, but we would need to commit to that before we could move
> to the behavior you want.

indeed, I personally think there's ZERO point in supporting anything
older than JDK 1.4 going forward. In the java world, 1.2 is akin to PG
continuing to support 7.2