On 02/17/2011 12:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner"<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
>> Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Would you check whether just casting the function result to (void)
>>> shuts it up?
>
>> Casting the result to (void) didn't change the warning. It shut up
>> when I declared a local variable and assigned the value to it (which
>> was then never used).
> Too bad. I believe gcc 4.6 will warn about *that*, so it's not going to
> be much of an improvement for long.
>
>
Ugh. Isn't there some sort of pragma or similar we can use to shut it up?
cheers
andrew