Re: texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast [REVIEW]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast [REVIEW]
Дата
Msg-id 4D354935.7090702@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast [REVIEW]  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast [REVIEW]  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 17.01.2011 22:33, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut<peter_e@gmx.net>  writes:
>> On mån, 2011-01-17 at 07:35 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> In fact, aren't there cases where the *length test* also fails?
>
>> Currently, two text values are only equal of strcoll() considers them
>> equal and the bits are the same.  So this patch is safe in that regard.
>
>> There is, however, some desire to loosen this.
>
> That isn't ever going to happen, unless you'd like to give up hash joins
> and hash aggregation on text values.

You could canonicalize the string first in the hash function. I'm not 
sure if we have all the necessary information at hand there, but at 
least with some encoding/locale-specific support functions it'd be possible.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Replication logging
Следующее
От: Itagaki Takahiro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast [REVIEW]