(2010/12/27 17:53), Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 11:53 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>
>> The attached patch is the modular version of SE-PostgreSQL.
>
> Looks interesting.
>
> Couple of thoughts...
>
> Docs don't mention row-level security. If we don't have it, I think we
> should say that clearly.
>
Indeed, it is a good idea the document mentions what features are not
implemented in this version clearly, not only row-level security, but
DDL permissions and so on. I'd like to revise it soon.
> I think we need a "Guide to Security Labels" section in the docs. Very
> soon, because its hard to know what is being delivered and what is not.
>
Does it describe what is security label and the purpose of them?
OK, I'd like to add this section here.
> Is the pg_seclabel table secure? Looks like the labels will be available
> to read.
>
If we want to control visibility of each labels, we need row-level
granularity here.
> How do we tell if sepgsql is installed?
>
Check existence of GUC variables of sepgsql.*.
> What happens if someone alters the configuration so that the sepgsql
> plugin is no longer installed. Does the hidden data become visible?
>
Yes. If sepgsql plugin is uninstalled, the hidden data become visible.
But no matter. Since only a person who is allowed to edit postgresql.conf
can uninstall it, we cannot uninstall it in run-time.
(An exception is loading a malicious module, but we will be able to
hook this operation in the future version.)
Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>