Re: wCTE behaviour

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Marko Tiikkaja
Тема Re: wCTE behaviour
Дата
Msg-id 4CDEAD76.1040803@cs.helsinki.fi
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: wCTE behaviour  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: wCTE behaviour  ("Clark C. Evans" <cce@clarkevans.com>)
Re: wCTE behaviour  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2010-11-13 5:08 PM +0200, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja<marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi>  writes:
>> On 13 Nov 2010, at 15:41, David Fetter<david@fetter.org>  wrote:
>>> Similarly, if a normal CTE called a data-changing function but was
>>> nevertheless not referred to, it would still run.
>
>> Actually, it wouldn't.
>
> Indeed, and that was considered a feature when we did it.  I think
> that having wCTEs behave arbitrarily differently on this point
> might be a bad idea.

So these queries would behave differently?

WITH t AS (DELETE FROM foo RETURNING *)
SELECT 1 WHERE false;

WITH t AS (DELETE FROM foo RETURNING *)
SELECT 1 FROM t LIMIT 0;


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: wCTE behaviour
Следующее
От: "Clark C. Evans"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: wCTE behaviour