Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> On 11/06/2010 01:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> What I *have* occasionally
>>> wished for is that the buildfarm script would act more like make -k with
>>> respect to the various test stages.
>
>> I'm not sure that would be a great advance. Certainly, right now I'm
>> going to be putting effort into the FTS stuff which I think should be
>> much higher up your list of wants.
>
> Agreed, that would be far more useful.
FTS stuff? Would that also include additions to the current SOAP
interface of the buildfarm?
lg
Stefan