Re: string function - "format" function proposal
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: string function - "format" function proposal |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4CB6FC9B.6080907@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: string function - "format" function proposal (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: string function - "format" function proposal
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/14/2010 08:25 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> IMHO, I like {} syntax as like as C# because the format strings are extensible.
>> { pos [ : format ] } -- ex {3:l}, {3} (, and {l} could be also supported)
>> Escapes: {{ => {, }} => }
> My personal preference (and Pavel's, I guess) is to use the C-like
> syntax. But I wouldn't be upset if consensus congealed around some
> other option.
They're both somewhat arcane. But I think the C syntax is likely to be
more familiar to a wider group of users (including, for example, perl
hackers) than the C# syntax, and is to be preferred on those grounds alone.
cheers
andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: