Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4CAB3E2D.8000108@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Another check: does specifying replication by server in such detail mean
> we can't specify robustness at the transaction level? If we gave up that
> feature, it would be a greatloss for performance tuning.
It's orthagonal. The kinds of configurations we're talking about simply
define what it will mean when you commit a transaction "with synch".
However, I think we're getting way the heck away from how far we really
want to go for 9.1. Can I point out to people that synch rep is going
to involve a fair bit of testing and debugging, and that maybe we don't
want to try to implement The World's Most Configurable Standby Spec as a
first step?
-- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: