Re: Basic JSON support
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Basic JSON support |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4CAA7AB8.5050205@dunslane.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Basic JSON support (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/04/2010 08:00 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > All, > >> But having said that, I wonder whether bison/flex are really the best >> tool for the job in the first place. From what I understand of JSON >> (which admittedly ain't much) a bison parser seems like overkill: >> it'd probably be both bloated and slow compared to a simple handwritten >> recursive-descent parser. > This appears not to be necessary. The author of JSONval has indicated > that, should we choose to include it in PostgreSQL 9.1, he is open to > re-licensing. > > So on a completely *technical* basis, do we want to use JSONval? I agree with Tom that a hand-cut RD parser is much more likely to be the way to go. We should not use bison/flex for parsing data values. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: