Tom Lane schrieb am 14.09.2010 18:34:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>
>> On 14/09/10 17:08, thommy wrote:
>>
>>> -[ RECORD 2 ]----+---------------------------
>>> feature_id | B032
>>> feature_name | Extended dynamic SQL
>>> sub_feature_id | 01
>>> sub_feature_name |<describe input statement>
>>> is_supported | NO
>>> is_verified_by |
>>> comments |
>>>
>
>
>> Can you elaborate, what is wrong with the above? What did you expect to
>> see instead?
>>
>
> What I see in SQL:99 is
>
> | 3 | B032 | Extended dynamic SQL |
> | | | |
> | 4 | B032-| <describe input> statement |
> 01
>
> so I think his point is that the right angle bracket is in the wrong place.
> Can't get terribly excited about it ...
>
And in SQL:2003** in fact it reads
| |FeatureID| Feature Name |
| 11 | B032-01 | <describe input statement> |
so it seems I was wrong and PostgreSQL did it right.
:-)
I am still curious as I found B32-01 the only entry where angle brackets
were used but who am I to doubt the standard. So thank you everybody for
the quick answers and sorry for any inconveniences.
Regards, Thommy
** got an huge PDF named
"Information technology --- Database languages --- SQL --- Part 2:
Foundation (SQL/Foundation)"