Re: leaky views, yet again

(2010/07/21 19:26), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/7/21 KaiGai Kohei<kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>:
>>> On the other hand, if it's enough from a performance
>>> point of view to review and mark only a few built-in functions like
>>> index operators, maybe it's ok.
>>>
>> I also think it is a worthful idea to try as a proof-of-concept.
>
> Yeah.  So, should we mark this patch as Returned with Feedback, and
> you can submit a proof-of-concept patch for the next CF?
>
Yes, it's fair enough.

-- 
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>