Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch> wrote:
> On 07/15/2010 10:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> BTW I think this patch series makes sense, though I haven't
>> looked at it in detail. I guess it means I'll have to have a
>> look at the IMessages stuff as well.
>
> Yes, only after adding these patches to the commit fest, I
> realized that I'dd have to add the dynshmem and imessages patches
> for bgworker to be of any use.
> @Kevin: how do we proceed WRT the commit fest? Having bgworker in
> there, but not its dependencies (dynshmem and imessages) is what
> I'd call a conflict. OTOH, both of those patches have been
> published way before the commit fest started as well.
Since these two patches were posted before the commit fest started,
and are prerequisites for six properly submitted patches, I'm going
with the "spirit of the law" and saying it's OK to add them. Does
the application allow that?
-Kevin