On 22/06/10 00:59, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Heikki Linnakangas's message of lun jun 21 17:47:43 -0400 2010:
>
>> Maybe it would be easier to somehow protect the portal then, and throw
>> an error if you try to close it. We could just mark the portal as
>> PORTAL_ACTIVE while we run the user statements, but that would also
>> forbid fetching or moving it. I'm thinking of a new "pinned" state,
>> which is like PORTAL_READY except that the portal can't be dropped like
>> in PORTAL_ACTIVE state.
>
> Why is it an error to close the portal?
What useful behavior áºould you expect from closing it?
> Maybe we should keep it closed
> (i.e. don't free it), and error out only when it is accessed again.
I guess we could do that too, but it really doesn't make much sense to
close it in the first place.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com