Excerpts from Heikki Linnakangas's message of lun jun 21 17:47:43 -0400 2010:
> Maybe it would be easier to somehow protect the portal then, and throw
> an error if you try to close it. We could just mark the portal as
> PORTAL_ACTIVE while we run the user statements, but that would also
> forbid fetching or moving it. I'm thinking of a new "pinned" state,
> which is like PORTAL_READY except that the portal can't be dropped like
> in PORTAL_ACTIVE state.
Why is it an error to close the portal? Maybe we should keep it closed
(i.e. don't free it), and error out only when it is accessed again.
--
Ãlvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support