Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Marko Tiikkaja
Тема Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs
Дата
Msg-id 4BE95494.7080209@cs.helsinki.fi
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs  (Nicolas Barbier <nicolas.barbier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs  (Nicolas Barbier <nicolas.barbier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
This is getting way off topic, but:

On 5/11/10 3:55 PM +0300, Nicolas Barbier wrote:
> T2>  SELECT i FROM a WHERE i = 1 FOR SHARE; -- Lock a with i = 1 FOR SHARE.
>   i
> ---
>   1
> (1 Zeile)
>
> T2>  SELECT a_id FROM b WHERE a_id = 1; -- Check whether it's got
> anything pointing to it.
>   a_id
> ------
> (0 Zeilen)
>
> T2>  DELETE FROM a WHERE i = 1; -- Nope, so delete a with i = 1 (this
> blocks, because T1 is still holding the lock).

Obviously you wouldn't delete anything with a SHARE lock.


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Nicolas Barbier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs
Следующее
От: Nicolas Barbier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs