Re: no universally correct setting for fsync
| От | Greg Smith |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: no universally correct setting for fsync |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4BE8AD1D.6010905@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: no universally correct setting for fsync (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote: >> The real question is how much of a speed-up fsync provides compared to >> the same workload with synchronous_commit disabled. The only case for >> fsync=off is one where that number is much faster. >> > I can't say I've tested this. Most of my head-to-heads on fsync were > before asych existed. > Ditto for me. Curious about that, and I'd like to help work on improving this chunk of the docs too. I don't know about you guys, but I'm swamped until after PGCon though. I have some hardware testing stuff planned anyway later this month, can check exactly where this situation truly stands on a couple of common pieces of hardware (next system has one of the LSI controllers Dell rebrands too). I'll have the systems setup for something similar anyway--can certainly see fsync differences with pgbench--easy to throw this test into the mix too. With that report, we should have the info needed to really nail this down accurately. I can make my own proofreading pass of what Josh has already been doing that also reflects the new data, and then we can commit something that's good and well reviewed for 9.0 here. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: