Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
> But your case of trying to "automatically" build/track the branch heads
> for the buildfarm w/ git has a lot more strict requirements of the
> *incremental* *conversion* *of* *CVS* than any of us had/have...
>
Actually, the thing that has recently annoyed me most has nothing to do
with the buildfarm. I wanted to use git cherry-pick to backport
something and the brokenness of the back branches in the git repo made
that a non-starter. Saying "oh, well, if we really moved to git this
wouldn't be an issue" doesn't help me much.
cheers
andrew