Re: [HACKERS] Bug on pg_lesslog

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Karl Denninger
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Bug on pg_lesslog
Дата
Msg-id 4B7440A2.6050607@denninger.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Bug on pg_lesslog  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Bug on pg_lesslog  (Koichi Suzuki <koichi.szk@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 23:39 +0900, Koichi Suzuki wrote: 
Dear Folks;

A very serious bug was reported on pg_lesslog.   So far, I found it's
a bug in pg_compresslog.   Please do not use pg_compresslog and
pg_decompresslog until improved version is uploaded.

I strongly advise to take base backup of your database.

I apologize for inconvenience.   I'll upload the new version ASAP.   
Should this go out on announce? 
I certainly think so.  Anyone who gets caught "by surprise" on this could quite possibly lose all their data!

I (fortunately) caught it during TESTING of my archives - before I needed them.

-- Karl Denninger

Вложения

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Scott Marlowe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump superflous warning message
Следующее
От: Chris Barnes
Дата:
Сообщение: Truncate and delete adds wal logs for slave to process.