Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
| От | Kevin Grittner |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4B5D782C020000250002EB76@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > It might be better to try a test case with lighter-weight objects, > say 5 million simple functions. A dump of that quickly settled into running a series of these: SELECT proretset, prosrc, probin, pg_catalog.pg_get_function_arguments(oid) AS funcargs, pg_catalog.pg_get_fun ction_identity_arguments(oid) AS funciargs, pg_catalog.pg_get_function_result(oid) AS funcresult, proiswindow, provolatile, proisstrict, prosecdef, proconfig, procost, prorows, (S ELECT lanname FROM pg_catalog.pg_language WHERE oid = prolang) AS lanname FROM pg_catalog.pg_proc WHERE oid = '1404528'::pg_catalog.oid (with different oid values, of course). Is this before or after the point you were worried about. Anything in particular for which I should be alert? -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: