Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 28203.1264355615@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> I'm afraid pg_dump didn't get very far with this before:
> pg_dump: WARNING: out of shared memory
> pg_dump: SQL command failed
> Given how fast it happened, I suspect that it was 2672 tables into
> the dump, versus 26% of the way through 5.5 million tables.
Yeah, I didn't think about that. You'd have to bump
max_locks_per_transaction up awfully far to get to where pg_dump
could dump millions of tables, because it wants to lock each one.
It might be better to try a test case with lighter-weight objects,
say 5 million simple functions.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: